Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church summarizes standing out that the State must defend ‘ ‘ the beginning of the subsidiariedade, that corresponds: the respect and the promotion accomplish of the primate of the person human being and the family; valuation of the associations and the intermdias organizations, in the proper basic options and all the ones that cannot be delegated or be assumed by others ‘ ‘ (N. 187). ‘ ‘ The good comum’ ‘ the presented work was displayed by Brave Ricardo M.L.C. (24/11/2009) consists of innumerable magisteriais citations. The expositor appraised the common good saying that it is the good of all and each one, remaining common, because indivisible. is indivisible because only when the individuals if join are then possible to reach it, to increase it and to preserve it, also in sight of the future. It is important to stand out that the common good is understood as the social and communitarian dimension of the well moral one. ‘ ‘ As well as moral acting of the individual if it carries through in making the good, thus social acting reaches the fullness carrying through the good comum’ ‘ (CDSI n164).
The common good, as is said, is necessarily in reference to the person human being, holding in itself exactly three essential elements: the respect for the person human being as such; the social welfare and the development of the proper group; an order joust, lasting, insurance that the peace promotes (cf. Catecismo n 1907-1909). Blessed Pope XVI, in its last Caritas encyclical letter from the pope in veritate n 7, affirms that ‘ ‘ she is necessary to have in great consideration the common good. To love somebody is to want its and to work well efficiently for the same. To the side of the individual good, a on good to the social life of the people exists: the good comum’ ‘. The common good, therefore, corresponds to the highest inclinations of the man, but it is an arduous good to reach, because it demands the capacity and the constant search of the good of outrem as if he was proper. Thus, exactly being laborious the conquest of the O common good, the man never it can leave to search it, in view of what it he is proper: ‘ ‘ the good of all and each one ‘ ‘. Consideraes final the effort that if it demanded for summarizing each lesson took to a bigger understanding of all the subjects that are developed.
Each time that if made memory of the lessons was a possibility more than to learn ‘ ‘ for vida’ ‘ , because it was necessary to make a ruminao of that said and to synthecize in some few lines. Everything this, in short, left this more pleasant work to read e, over all, opens a fan for new studies, to the step that had been raised several other subjects the ends.
Scrates understood this well, therefore, it made with its irony, with that excessively the things could be aperceber of the complexity of the causes and the ends of all, however, the majority was not interested for these questions, restricting itself, thus, speculative knowing to the philosophers, which, as already he said we must all applause, however, not necessarily to bend us in submission, therefore, the cognoscitiva capacity reach in them to all, even so laziness of the search also wound to many. The continuity of the quarrel in as the paragraph if of the one for the agreement that the author has, of that no source of knowledge if initiates for the understanding of the particular things, but, in contrast, must be apprehended the knowledge of what it is more universal possible, so that enxergando beyond, the ideas can go if organizing and funnelling themselves. In this paragraph, Aristotle still sample that the search of the man cannot stop in mere answers, but, must always make with that these answers, are each time more concise and can be in been constant of perfectioning. To this point I agree to the opinion of the author, because in itself the man tends to search the perfect one, even so, it is not perfect, and with the search of the perfection how much he will become it to the answers more perfect; how much to the dynamics of this search stimulates that them to walk, not according to its certainties, but, according to its cognoscitiva capacity that for signal is indizvel and unimaginable. In short, it is necessary to leave itself to apprehend for (logos), the reason that does not nationalize in them, but, it considers them an efficient dynamics. Although short, the third paragraph, holds great part of the central idea of the text, therefore, the author dialogues the beginning of the philosophy as being something that searched answers, more specifically: which would be the first principle, the cause of existence and the last end of all the things? This process of inquietante and infrevel investigation if extends throughout the room paragraph, thus ratifying, the philosophical principle as ' questioning curioso'.
A person can and must correct itself, but not in accordance with a norm, that either external same itself, exactly that she is most perfect of the norms. It must only correct itself in tune with the way that it is in same itself ' ' (PAVEL, apud in, HARVEST, 2004, P. 125). Thinking about establishing an initial conceptualization on what he would be ' ' listening clnica' ' , she gives credit yourself to be valid to use a counterpoint between what it is and what is not, in this task will use some concepts of Andres Levy (2001), that to the definiz it says: This work (clinical listening) does not have, therefore, nothing in common with a wall, that would consist of ' ' to make dizer' ' or to make ' ' confessar' ' occult or forgotten facts, whose rank in evidence would allow when clnicodesvendar the direction and ' ' to make it entender' ' ; With an interpretation that would be established according to formula of Ricoeur, on a' ' suspeita' ' , on the certainty that, atrazdo said, one another one to know would be pedindopara to be discovered (LEVY, 2001, p.24) (grifos ours). It is distinguished, in the citation of this author, who would not be clinical listening the service of preset interpretations, nor so little of attempts of it fits. It is perceived clinical while place of exposition and consequence understanding of the phenomena told as if present, moving away it thus from other modalities of listening: If clinical it can be defined as a clinic of the direction, its target, however, is not to restore it or to reestablish it. Of this point of view, it must be standed out that summary, assuring the order (they ibidem, p.26). It can be said of this form that in the clinic takes advantage the speech and speaks of free citizens, desejantes, that they will be ‘ ‘ ouvidos’ ‘ in its sufferings and you distress; does not stop being mere ‘ ‘ ouvintes’ ‘ organization, to the returns with a suffering, a crisis that the burrow entirely; the physician assumes citizens livings creature, desejantes and pensantes, speaking equally, as much nothing to say how much to become to know, or to meet a direction for its emotions, its souvenirs or its history, that they construct at every moment.
THE MULTIFACETED ONES OF THE LETRAMENTO Thays Macedo Mascarenhas Master UNEB – Campus II This text is part of a mestrado research of, carried through in a School of the field, in Fair of Santana, the Bahia. It excites a theoretical quarrel that bases the conception of letramento. For this, I present estimated and theoretical quarrels on the subject, focusing that practical of reading and the writing in the scope of the school they have discredited the orientation of letramento of its pupils, therefore for many educators, the letramento still is on only to the alfabetizao, to the act to learn to read and to write, disrespecting that the letramentos are multiple and situated, that is, depends on the social and cultural contexts. Letramento: between rules and concepts In the last few decades, it occurred a transformation in the form of if understanding the reading and the writing. The language passes to be interpreted as a dynamic process and the letramento started to be debated the Brazilian educational scene. The term letramento was used for the first time in Brazil, for Mary Kato, in 1986, in the text ' ' In the world of the writing: a perspective psicolingstica' ' , published for the publishing company It stokes. Two years later, it started to represent a referencial in the speech of the education, to the being defined for Tfouni (1988) in ' ' Adults not alfabetizados: avesso of avesso' ' retaken in posterior publications.
The underlying concepts to the Brazilian term letramento already were argued by the school of thought and intitled research New Literacy Studies (New Studies of the Letramento), mainly in the countries of English language. As To sound (1998), the denomination letramento is a version, in Portuguese, of the English word ' ' literacy' '. Kleiman (1995, P. 81) defines letramento ' ' as a set of practical social that uses the writing, while symbolic system and while technology, in specific contexts, for objectives especficos' '.