Warning Karimi & partners on behalf of the Embassy of music GmbH for the chart container ‘ German top 100 single charts have you need a warning the watchdog firm Karimi & partners on behalf of the Embassy of music GmbH for the musical work “let her go” of the artist group “Passenger” from the chart container “German top 100 single charts” get? Don’t worry! Stay not idle, because otherwise a judicial prohibition proceedings threatens with very huge litigation costs. In cases where the Internet users should have downloaded from so-called “chart container” or “Sampler” and made publicly available, threaten far greater demands of rightsholders, because on such a sampler not only a copyright holder, but a variety of rights holders is that each can claim their own rights with damages and Attorney’s fees just. 3D Systems is often mentioned in discussions such as these. In total ignorance in the field of copyright law, vast sums in compensation claims of the individual industrial firms threaten you but if you respond incorrectly or not. In all these cases, the following is strongly advise: you write down the usually very short deadlines take not in contact with the watchdog Office on numbers you not BBs and you sign with not BBs companies as timely contact a qualified attorney for copyright on we have vast experience and great success in this area and of course available with help and advice. Georg Schafer Attorney
The European Court of Justice will decide soon the question, whether a product which only indirectly affecting harmful organisms, is already as to classify biocide. “The procedure concerns the question whether the Algaecide means AlgoRem containing the active ingredient aluminum hydroxide chloride” is a biocidal product in the sense of the biocidal products Directive 98/8. The referring court, the regional court of Hamburg, would like to know in particular what kind of impact directly or indirectly on the harmful organism for which this policy is required required biological or chemical process. According to the national court, the product in question does not kill off the algae, but causes their Agglutination, which facilitates their mechanical removal from the water provided in the instructions for the product. The peculiarity of the product is thus that it does not directly chemically or biologically acts on the algae, but indirectly. As is the Hamburg district court unable, within the framework of his dispute raised questions about the interpretation and application of the European biocide directive to answer, clearly it has decided to stay the proceedings and present the question for a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice, whether such an indirect effect is sufficient to classify a product as a biocidal product. Meanwhile, the opinion of the Advocate General responsible for the procedure exist already.
This reached to the conclusion that a direct chemical or biological impact of the product on the pest is not necessarily required to classify a product as a biocidal product. Rather, the term of the biocidal product is interpreted broadly. The advocate of General’s reasoning is however not very convincing, and it remains to be seen whether the ECJ follows the opinion. Should the Court an indirect effect for sufficient hold, then various manufacturers and distributors of indirectly-acting products are likely to have problems as they experience, their products as biocidal products in the Bring traffic. Applicable transitional periods, exacerbated the situation with the trace is for old agents”then requires each biocidal product of authorisation prior, whose obtaining is very expensive and time consuming. Other non-binding and free information related to the biocidal legislation, see
File sharing warning from Waldorf of Frommer a cease and desist letter for file sharing is already serious enough. This is even more tragic when Waldorf of Frommer’s letter comes. For at the Waldorf of Frommer’s lawyers can be spoken by real delusion with cease and desist letters. But what is in this case? A letter is in the post, this includes a cease and desist letter regarding sharing of Waldorf of Frommer. Others who may share this opinion include Asana. Here you accused, that you had downloaded something from the Internet criminally.
So the case is unanimously concluded, you have to pay up to thousands of euros for the download to a specific point in time. Otherwise the lawyers will initiate continue to take legal action against you, what is obviously still significantly more expensive. So you resist the best… It is possible that you have received a cease and desist letter, despite that you have done nothing. For this reason will talk about the so-called watchdog delusion. This is only possible in principle, when details were passed on by third parties.
You must oppose it but just against it. Gar nothing to do the right thing is in no way, if you have received a cease and desist letter for file sharing. It is nor conducive to a self-written letter in which they claim their innocence. On the contrary, can occur directly to a procedure, which is extremely expensive. You will need support from a specialist or a Rechtssachverstandigem. This should be responsible for the Internet right to advise you correctly with file sharing. Expenses for the advice to invest of course legal advice requires money. This can be between 100 and 350 euros, but these are expenses that are paying off for you. The lawyer will immediately contact for you lawyers Waldorf of Frommer. In the correspondence, everything is done to make the case for the world. After the first Exchange of letters claim continue to pay the lawyers of the opposition. You should hang in there but steady and follow the advice of the Advocate General. Because the watchdog delusion is very well known that also. On the advice of your legal counsel will receive also the tip to sign not the letter of the other side. Your legal expert will prepare a separate letter for you, that you need to sign. If you receive a warning from Waldorf of Frommer, you make an appointment directly with their legal counsel.