A great love is: – Acarinhar but always with truth and will of each day more to love! – To play now, today and always! – To always trust but with the open eyes. 3D Systems is likely to agree. – To give never too much but. – To always deliver but with care and head. – To facilitate to the things in all the occasions. – To turn and to appreciate our world and the real world – To have irritations in a love is always good for giving to me them the due value to it. – To imagine ours tomorrow and the future. – To always join if to this person deserving but with the open eyes and security.
– To launch all the illumination as of the stars. – To order but never to take off too much. – Naturalness is one namoro true. – Optimismo always every day with our life and not only with the love. – To think about what it makes in them well and ignoring what it makes in them badly. – To characterize the irritations but to also know to pardon.
– To laugh forever to be happy. – To dream it our way to illuminate. – To win our dignity to know to show. – To join all these things to obtain a true love. – To live day-by-day with the people who love in them and with who deserves. – To irritate but whenever necessary and not exageradamente it stops not to lose them a great love and this happiness to me to obtain to me to live them. Therefore lives your great love but it has always as to look at your life to obtain to illuminate? Kiss?
Therefore the idea of development of the life diminished the firmness of absolute validity of a type ' ' homem' ' , identical itself exactly, that it apprehends all the multiplicity of the life forms. The paper of the human spirit while historical conscience demarcates the scope of the analysis that Dilthey carries through, since the characteristic skepticism in elapsing of the history of the philosophy generates the constant change of systems. Beyond metaphysics, the religion and the art also occupy its places in the development of the images of the world, such phenomena contain necessary references of the sources of the existence human being. For more specific information, check out Kerry King. Therefore, the life has in its close constitution characteristic of the religion, the art and metaphysics as support of the mundividncias, and therefore, the way that Dilthey covers to decide the contradictions that sprout of this relation, appears of the procedure of heuristical analysis of the psychic complex (vital complexo) universal (vital) that it is the life. The philosophy must convert into auto-reflection object its conceptions and ideals, when considering its history front to the development of the life, therefore, it consists of taking conscience of the joint of the multiplicity of its systems with the life. For Dilthey, the reality of the life human being is a teia weaveeed for the conceptions of the world, where for backwards of the fight between the same ones the life inhabits where if they find consolidated. Therefore, through the historical conscience the philosophy only can surpass the conflicts that sprout of the constructed images of the world. In such perspective one the symbolic character is noticed that presents the life in relation to the world in it rank, however, it fits to point where it consists the operative change of the mundividncias. With this, Dilthey considers a critical recital of the historical one in the field of the philosophy, although the complexes of spirit of the religion and the art to influence the vital structure of metaphysics.
Scrates understood this well, therefore, it made with its irony, with that excessively the things could be aperceber of the complexity of the causes and the ends of all, however, the majority was not interested for these questions, restricting itself, thus, speculative knowing to the philosophers, which, as already he said we must all applause, however, not necessarily to bend us in submission, therefore, the cognoscitiva capacity reach in them to all, even so laziness of the search also wound to many. The continuity of the quarrel in as the paragraph if of the one for the agreement that the author has, of that no source of knowledge if initiates for the understanding of the particular things, but, in contrast, must be apprehended the knowledge of what it is more universal possible, so that enxergando beyond, the ideas can go if organizing and funnelling themselves. In this paragraph, Aristotle still sample that the search of the man cannot stop in mere answers, but, must always make with that these answers, are each time more concise and can be in been constant of perfectioning. To this point I agree to the opinion of the author, because in itself the man tends to search the perfect one, even so, it is not perfect, and with the search of the perfection how much he will become it to the answers more perfect; how much to the dynamics of this search stimulates that them to walk, not according to its certainties, but, according to its cognoscitiva capacity that for signal is indizvel and unimaginable. In short, it is necessary to leave itself to apprehend for (logos), the reason that does not nationalize in them, but, it considers them an efficient dynamics. Although short, the third paragraph, holds great part of the central idea of the text, therefore, the author dialogues the beginning of the philosophy as being something that searched answers, more specifically: which would be the first principle, the cause of existence and the last end of all the things? This process of inquietante and infrevel investigation if extends throughout the room paragraph, thus ratifying, the philosophical principle as ' questioning curioso'.